Title: Inclusion Starts With Recruiters—Reimagining the Power and Responsibility of Talent Gatekeepers
**“No one leaves school aspiring to be a recruiter.” That’s the kind of statement that winds me up and fires me up in equal measure. I believe recruitment is one of the most influential levers for equity and inclusion that any industry possesses, yet it is too often misunderstood, undervalued, or treated as a stepping stone. If we truly want to build a world where everyone belongs and flourishes, then inclusion must start at the gateway: recruitment. The challenge—and opportunity—lies in transforming both the mindset and models of those who stand at the door.”**
Recruitment, at its core, is both privilege and responsibility. For years, I thrived as an agency recruiter—seventeen years learning the rhythms and realities of this world. But it wasn’t until I started to interrogate my own habits, biases, and sense of impact that I realised just how much the recruitment profession shapes who enters, who rises, and who participates in our workplaces.
That realisation didn’t just alter my own path. It kindled a mission: help recruitment itself evolve to lead on equity, inclusion, and accessibility. This isn’t a side mission for recruitment—it’s the main event. Our industry is responsible for so much of the job market’s movement; we’re both mirror and engine for societal change. The Inclusion Bites Podcast, hosted by the inimitable Joanne Lockwood of SEE Change Happen, offered a potent and honest space to reflect on this challenge, the current realities, and what it means to do the work differently.
Joanne is no stranger to disruption. As founder of SEE Change Happen, she brings both lived and professional mastery to the world of fostering inclusion and belonging. Her episodes cut through surface-level chatter, pressing guests and listeners alike to dig into the systemic, the strategic, and—critically—the human. More than [INSERT_VIEW_COUNT] people have already watched our interview on YouTube, with many more tuning in via Spotify and Apple Podcasts. If this conversation sparks something for you—questions, pushback, or agreement—I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments below. I read every one.
Below, I will walk you through the most resonant themes from my conversation with Joanne, weaving in her insights, my stories, and the actionable ideas we surfaced. This is not just a debrief; it’s a call to those in positions of talent stewardship, however accidental or intentional that path has been.
---
### The Tick-Box Trap: Inclusion Beyond Performance and Pretence
I vividly remember my earliest days in agency recruitment. Ethics were simply expected of me; the urge to “do right” by people was strong, but the language and tools of true inclusion weren’t yet on my radar. There’s a critical distinction between being “nice” or “fair” and architecting a hiring process that is actively equitable, accessible, and anti-biased. Yet, as Joanne put it with trademark candour: “So many just talk about being ethical. They want to create opportunities for everybody because it makes business sense… but it’s all a bit performative. It’s almost a tick.”
That observation stings because it’s true. The inclusion-washing that pervades recruitment is not for lack of good intent. It is, in large part, the outcome of survival-mode; recruiters—especially in the agency world—are measured by metrics that value speed, volume, and margin. Properly embedding inclusion? That feels like slowing things down. Many recruiters simply don’t have the resources or permission to overhaul the dusty models their KPIs demand.
When Joanne challenged, “What are you doing for yourselves?” she nailed the paradox: recruitment agencies sometimes promise clients the world of diversity, but fail to hold up a mirror to their own practices. “If you’re trying to show a better way to your client and you’re not matching that, it lacks authenticity.”
What’s needed is a fundamentally different approach to both internal culture and external service. Representation among recruiters themselves remains stubbornly homogeneous, despite the fact that our talent pools are rich in diversity. The industry should reflect, champion, and connect the communities we serve, not merely transact with them.
---
### Moving From Sales to True Consulting: The Evolution of the Recruitment Career
One of the most persistent myths in recruitment is that it’s all about sales. The classic recruiter stereotype—slick, hard-selling, and motivated solely by commission—remains stubbornly embedded in both public imagination and, unfortunately, industry recruitment preference.
Joanne reminded me of Bill Borman’s quip: “No one leaves school aspiring to be a recruiter.” Instead, many fall into the field by accident—carrying over a sales background, only to find themselves in a cycle of placing people (rather than truly partnering with them or with clients).
But recruitment today should (and must) be so much more. It’s workforce planning. It’s talent development. It’s organisational design, job marketing, candidate experience, and consultancy in the real sense of the word. I see the most effective recruiters not only filling requisitions, but acting as business strategists—people who can understand a client’s employer brand, talent needs, workforce gaps, and even the pestle forces shaping their sector.
Joanne and I both agreed: the future belongs to true talent consultants, not transactional CV-slingers. If we let technology eat up the basics—sourcing, filtering, compliance—then the unique human value becomes advisory, contextual, and generative. “Why are we still plugging into the basics of what a recruiter does?” I asked. “Why aren’t we sitting with clients about organisational design, workforce planning, employer brand?” The path to professionalism and industry respect lies in elevating both our skills and our offer.
---
### The Metrics That Sabotage Inclusion: Speed, Scale, and the Self-Defeating Race
Digging deeper, I see one of the great ironies of recruitment: the very metrics designed to drive results are the ones most likely to undermine inclusion. Recruiters are often measured on “time to hire,” volume, and output—rewarded for being quick, not for being thoughtful.
This speed imperative is deeply embedded, particularly in contingent models. When every tick of the clock means more pressure and less resource, the call to “build in inclusion” sounds like an alien language. “We need to slow things down,” I hear myself telling clients and colleagues. But that’s countercultural in an industry built on urgency.
In truth, a request for speed often masks deeper pain: clients desperate to make up for lost ground or retain market position. Yet, the “spray and pray” approach—blitzing job boards and databases—can never deliver true fit, much less equity.
So, I ask: what if we measured different outcomes? What if reward and repeat business accrued to those who could show not just fast placements, but higher retention, more diverse slates, better candidate experience, and deeper consultation? What if value was attached to genuine partnership, not just the number of CVs sent in a five-minute slot?
---
### Unlocking the Untapped Talent Pool: Reinventing Recruitment for Over-50s and Beyond
Every conversation about inclusion in recruitment tends to default to early careers, social mobility, and emerging tech skills. Those are vital, of course. But the most underutilised, under-discussed talent pipeline is not young—it’s experienced.
I am increasingly alarmed by how hard it is for professionals over 50 to return to, or pivot within, the workforce. The data point is plain: our workforce is ageing, and yet both recruitment and client-side hiring seem obsessed with “youth potential.” It is as if experience evaporates in value after a certain birthday.
Joanne observed, “Millennials will turn 50 in 2030. At that point, over-50s become the bulk of our population or working population.” The demographic reality is inescapable: with declining birth rates and later retirements, the “classic” or vintage talent is our future. Yet, too often our hiring systems bias both explicitly and implicitly against them.
Sometimes, this is rooted in flawed assumptions on both sides of the hiring equation. Junior managers fear being overshadowed by seasoned candidates. Organisations fret about “fit” or “runway.” Candidates themselves may struggle with confidence, self-marketing, or resistance to starting again at a lower rung.
As recruiters, we must step up here—not just as agents, but as advocates and coaches. Are we creating programmes that welcome experienced professionals into new careers? Are we equipping them with upskilling, branding, or agency so they can be found and valued anew? Do we challenge clients who code for “energy” or “cultural fit” but mean “not too old”? These are not peripheral questions—they’re essential to an inclusive labour market.
---
### Candidate Coaching: Beyond Transactions to True Stewardship
For too long, recruitment has focused disproportionately on the client side—on those who pay the fees. The result? Candidates, particularly those out of work for extended periods, are left to flail in the market. I hear from women with exceptional experience who, after 400 job applications and months of silence, feel hope slip away.
This is an unacceptable failure of stewardship. If we don’t see coaching, development, and candidate support as integral to our offering, we leave swathes of talent—and potential—invisible. “Who’s going to coach those people to get them into work?” Joanne asked, cutting to the core of the issue.
There are blueprints to borrow from: mature apprenticeships, returner programmes, alumni networks, and career academies. Some recruiters shy away, fearing “we can’t charge candidates,” or that it sits outside our remit. But here’s the truth: by investing in candidate readiness, upskilling, and rebranding—especially for those who no longer “fit” the outdated job spec—we unlock massive value for our markets, our clients, and the individuals themselves.
Recruitment has the opportunity to become a profession centred not simply on filling vacancies but on maximising human prosperity and organisational effectiveness, across all ages and backgrounds.
---
### Levelling Up: Towards a Recruitment Model Built for Modern Inclusion
Where, then, do we go from here? For me, the way forward is both practical and radical. Firstly, recruitment firms must look inwards—turning the mirror on their own practices, demographics, and mindsets. Only by living what we advocate can we credibly drive inclusion for clients.
Secondly, we must evolve from “fillers” to full-spectrum advisors—blending traditional sourcing with deep understanding of recruitment technology, candidate attraction across new platforms (hello, TikTok), brand evaluation, and generational expertise. Imagine teams endowed with specialists in AI, social media, inclusion, and skills-based assessment, all available not just in senior executive search but across all levels and sectors.
Thirdly, we need courage. Courage to hold a higher standard, to push back gently (or not so gently) when clients demand bias-riddled shortlists, to open up never-utilised candidate pools, and to build new forms of partnership where business goals and inclusion are inseparable.
Lastly, we must champion continuous curiosity and learning. Recruitment evolves at pace. Yesterday’s magic formula could be tomorrow’s bottleneck. To keep up, we must peer over the fence—into marketing, tech, generational sociology, behavioural psychology—so that our own “group think” doesn’t become our downfall.
---
### Closing Reflection: A Rallying Cry for Gatekeepers
At every point in my career, the most significant change has come not from the easy wins but from questioning the unspoken “truths”—and pushing for more. Recruitment is too valuable, too powerful, and too pregnant with potential to be left to habit or accident.
Inclusion truly does start with recruiters. It is within our gift and our grasp to shift the trajectory, not just of hiring processes, but of lives and of the organisations that shape our collective future. I do not accept the tick-box. I reject the “performance of inclusion” in favour of a meaningful, measurable commitment to progress.
If you’re a recruiter—agency, in-house, RPO or something entirely new—I urge you: stare down the metrics, untangle the old models, and remake your own sense of professional purpose. We are not just shifting CVs; we are designing society.
We may have fallen into this career. But we have the power to transform it into the vanguard of societal change.
**If you’ve made it this far, I want to hear from you. What would it take for you to invest in inclusion from wherever you sit? Where are you seeing the bravest and most innovative talent stewardship? Drop your thoughts in the comments below. I read every one.**
Ready to pick up the baton? Let’s build something bold—together.